<b>DUE PROCESS OF LAW IN EUROPEAN UNION’S ECONOMIC SANCTIONS: THE RESPONSE TO UKRAINIAN CRISIS</b><br/>DEVIDO PROCESSO DE LEI NAS SANÇÕES ECONÔMICAS DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA: A RESPOSTA À CRISE UCRANIANA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22293/2179-1376.v11i20.1259Resumo
This article focuses on the economic sanctions and the listing process in the light of due process of law, as well as the legitimacy of the European Union to impose such sanctions under international law. It has a qualitative approach, using the methodology of documental analysis (particularly the documents from the European Union Council and Commission) and bibliographical research. Since 2014 the European Union has imposed restrictive measures against the Russian Federation in response to the annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol, as well as ‘destabilization’ of Ukraine. Due to the imposition of these measures, 159 persons were subject to assets freezing and visa bans; 41 entities had their assets frozen in the EU; also including economic sanctions such as the limitation of Russian state-owned financial institutions to the European capital markets; and the access to ‘sensitive’ technologies, particularly in the energetic and military industries. As a conclusion, the listing process has improved considerably in the past years to align itself with the principle of due process. Critically, it is indicated the need to allow the targets to be heard and present their defense before any measures taken and in urgent matters which by its nature demand inaudita alteram parte decisions, the provision of injunctive relief.Referências
ANGUELOV, Nicolay. Economic sanctions vs. soft pow-er: lessons from North Korea, Myanmar, and the Middle East. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
BROEK, Melissa van Den; HAZELHORST, Monique; ZANGER, Wouter de. Asset freezing: smart sanction or criminal charge? Merkourios: Utrecht Journal of International and Eu-ropean Law, Utrecht, v. 27, n. 72, p.18-27, jan/jun, 2010.
BROWNLIE, Ian. Principles of public international law. 4 ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
ENGLAND. Magna Carta Libertatum of June 15, 1215. Available at: https://www.bl.uk/magna-carta/articles/magna-carta-english-translation. Access on: 30 January 2020.
EUROPE. Council of the European Union. Guidelines on Implementa-tion and Evaluation of Restrictive Measures (sanctions) in the Framework of the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy. Guideline nº 6749/05 PESC 159 FIN 80, of 2 december, 2005. Brussels, 2 dec. 2012. p. 1-38. Available at: http://register.consilium.eur opa.eu/doc/srv?l=EN&f=ST 15114 2005 INIT. Access on: 04 January 2020.
EUROPE. Council of the European Union. EU restrictive measures. 2014. Available at: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/EN/foraff/135804.pdf. Access on: 08 January 2020.
EUROPE. Court of Justice of the European Union. Case 210/00. Opinion of Advocate General Stix-Hackl delivered on 27 No-vember 2001. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62000CC0210. Access on: 05 January 2020.
EUROPE. Court of Justice of the European Union. Case C-617/10. Opinion of the Advocate General Cruz Villalón delivered on 12 June 2012. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62010CC0617. Access on: 05 January 2020.
EUROPE. European Commission. Commission Guidance note on the implementation of certain provisions of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014. Brussels, 25 sep. 2015. Available at: http://europa.eu/newsroom/sites/newsroom/files/docs/body/1_act_part1_v2_en.pdf Access on 16 January 2020.
EUROPEAN UNION. Council decision 2014/265/CFSP of 12 May 2014. Amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning re-strictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. Official Journal of the European Union. Brussels, Belgium, 12 may. 2014. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014D0265 Access on 16 January 2020.
EUROPEAN UNION. Rules Of Procedure EUR-Lex - L: 2012:265:TOC - EN, of September 25, 2012. Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice. Official Journal of the European Union. Lux-embourg, LX, 29 set. 2012. Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2012-10/rp_en.pdf. Access on: 04 January 2020.
GARCIA, João Marcos Prado. Due process of law: direito constitucional comparado em inglês. Joinville: Clube dos Au-tores, 2010.
GIUMELLI, Francesco. Coercing, constraining and signal-ling: explaining UN and EU sanctions after the cold war. Essex: ECPR Press, 2011.
GIUMELLI, Francesco. How EU sanctions work: A new narra-tive. Chaillot Paper, Paris, v. 129, p. 1-38, May 2013.
GORDON, Joy. Smart Sanctions Revisited. Ethics & International Affairs, Fairfield, v. 25, n. 03, p.315-335, set. 2011. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0892679411000323. Access on: 16 January 2020.
HUFBAUER, Gary Clyde et al. Economic sanctions reconsid-ered. 3. ed. Washington: Peterson Institute for International Eco-nomics, 2007.
KELSEN, Hans. Reine Rechtslehre: Das Problem der Gerechtigkeit. 2. ed. Leipzig: Franz Deuticke, 1960.
LIN, Tom C. W. Financial Weapons of War. Minnesota Law Review, Minneapolis, v. 100, n. 4, p.1377-1440, jun. 2016. Available at: http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Lin_ONLINEPDF.pdf. Access on: 04 January 2020. (article)
MAROSSI, Ali Z; BASSETT, Maris R (eds.). Economic sanc-tions under international law: unilateralism, multilateralism, legitimacy and consequences. The Hague: Asser Press, 2015.
MATTHEWS, John Potter Cuyler. John Foster Dulles and the Suez Crisis of 1956: a fifty-year perspective. 2016. Available at: http://www.unc.edu/depts/diplomat/item/2006/0709/matt/matthews_suez.html. Access on: 04 January 2020.
MCGEHEE, Lucius Polk. Due process of law under the fed-eral constitution. Long Island: Edward Thompson Company, 1906.
MORIARTY, Brid; MASSA, Eva (eds.). Human rights law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
NYE JUNIOR, Joseph S. Soft power: the means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs, 2004.
OPPENHEIM, Lassa. International Law: A Treatise Peace, Vol. 1, Gallica Bibliotheca Numérique, 1905.
REISMAN, William Michael. Sanctions and International Law: The Cuban Embargo and Human Rights. 2008. Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5938&context=fss_papers. Access on: 03 January 2020.
SHAWN, Michael N. International Law. 6. ed. New York: Cam-bridge Press, 2008.
STIX-HACKL. Opinion of Advocate General Stix-Hackl, deliv-ered on 13 September 2001, Curia, Europa. Available at: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/showPdf.jsf?docid=46573&doclang=EN. Access on: 06 January 2020.
TOMKINS, Adam. Our republican constitution. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005.
UNITED KINGDOM. House of Lords. European Union Com-mittee. 11th Report of Session 2016–17: The legality of EU sanc-tions. London, 2017. Available at: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201617/ldselect/ldeucom/102/10202.htm. Access on: 05 January 2020.
UNITED NATIONS. General Assembly Security Council of the United Nations. Supplement to an agenda for peace: position paper of the secretary-general on the occasion of the fiftieth anniversary of the United Nations. Available at: http://www.un.org/documents/ga/docs/50/plenary/a50-60.htm. Access on: 04 January 2020.
UNITED NATIONS. International Court of Justice. Reparation for injuries suffered in the service of the United Nations. Advisory Opinion of April 11th, 1949. Available at: http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/4/004-19490411-ADV-01-00-EN.pdf. Access on: 03 January 2020.
UNITED NATIONS. United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. Visit of the special rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures on the enjoyment of human rights to the Russian Federation, 24 to 28 April 2017: end of mission state-ment preliminary observations and recommendations. Available at: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=21543&LangID=E. Access on: 08 January 2018.
UNITED NATIONS. United Nations Office on Genocide Pre-vention and the Responsibility to Protect. Responsibility to Protect. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/about-responsibility-to-protect.html. Access on: 14 January 2020.
VILLALÓN, Jesus. La Regulacion Del Despido En Europa Régimen Formal Y Efectividad Practica. Editorial Tirant Lo Blanch, 2012.
VUGT, Adrienne de Moor-van. Administrative Sanctions in EU Law. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1992922. Ac-cess on: 05 January 2020.
WASSERMAN, Rhonda. Procedural due process: a reference guide to the United States constitution. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group, 2004.
WEISS, Tomas George. Sanctions as a foreign policy tool: weigh-ing humanitarian impulses. Journal of Peace Research, v. 36, n. 5, p.499-509, Sept. 1999. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022343399036005001.
WEISS, Tomas George et al (Org.). Political gain and civilian pain: humanitarian impacts of economic sanctions. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc, 1997.
